With the jury still out on whether a winter World Cup in 2026 is a good idea, football’s biggest competition has already undergone another change. In the first expansion of the World Cup since 1998, the tournament will not have 48 teams competing – an increase from 32.
FIFA accepted the proposal to increase the number of participants in a vote in Zurich on Tuesday, with the changes due come into effect from the 2026 edition onward. 16 groups of three teams will kick-off the first round, with only 32 heading into a knockout stage.
Many were against the decision; some approved; but Twitter unanimously gathered together in creating some of the best jokes of 2017 so far after the decision. The most favorite punch line was England.
The Three Lions, the nation that always disappoint on the big stage, were ridiculed. Many couldn’t help but point out that the increase in teams will give smaller nations the chance of eliminating England.
World Cup 2026 in North Korea:
— BigSport (@BigSportGB) January 10, 2017
England finish 3rd in Group P behind Mauritius and Vatican City.
Can't wait... pic.twitter.com/qAs4yzM6pH
BREAKING: The 2026 World Cup will include 48 teams...
— SPORF (@Sporf) January 10, 2017
....which means England will now get knocked out by Poundland and Lego Land. pic.twitter.com/Zl1U6c1d5o
FIFA confirm a 48-team World Cup from 2026, which will give teams such as Burkina Faso and Lego Land the opportunity to eliminate England
— Paddy Power (@paddypower) January 10, 2017
And then there were to jokes aimed at Scotland. Now they might finally be able to qualify.
Scotland fans right now after finding out the World Cup in 2026 will have 48 teams.. pic.twitter.com/VSPCE77eBQ
— Not Match of the Day (@NOT_MOTD) January 10, 2017
The Panini sticker book was a reoccurring theme, as more teams means an even bigger book. Others joked about not being able to buy the book once it increases in size and (probably) money.
48 teams in the next World Cup? I have immediately bought shares in Panini.
— Richard Osman (@richardosman) January 10, 2017
With the news of the 48 team world cup breaking, @OfficialPanini gives a sneak peek of their planned 2026 album... pic.twitter.com/jv5x6oP6fG
— Gandermonium (@Gandermonium) January 10, 2017
48 teams in the World Cup? As if it wasn't already expensive to complete the sticker book, now I'm gonna need a loan
— Smiv (@smivadee) January 10, 2017
The Panini sticker book for World Cup 2026!
— Troll Football (@TrollFootball) January 10, 2017
(Credits: @WELT_Sport ) pic.twitter.com/SNpvmz1ksj
What could be so wrong about having 48 teams? One man feels it will just open the door to boring matches between minnows.
World Cup 2026 in the United States.
— joshua jones (@joshuapsjones) January 10, 2017
3,500 people turn up to the 82,500 capacity MetLife Stadium to watch Burkina Faso draw 0-0 with Iran.
People can’t agree yet on whether it is a good decision or bad. Whilst some believe this is the death of the World Cup, others hailed FIFA’s decision to open the door to more countries.
RIP The World Cup
— Tom Williams (@tomwfootball) January 10, 2017
The World Cup expansion is a GOOD thing! More nations makes it more of a WORLD CUP & a chance for players you've never heard of to show off!
— Tony Tallis (@adtallis1) January 10, 2017
Compared with the elitist efforts to revamp the Champions League, the expansion of the World Cup is utterly harmless
— Oliver Kay (@OliverKayTimes) January 10, 2017
Of course, this change means more revenue for FIFA. Luckily for them, no one noticed...
FIFA say increasing the size of the World Cup is not a financial decision. Aye, the extra billion in revenue is just a nice coincidence.
— Paddy Power (@paddypower) January 10, 2017
FIFA weighing up the pros and cons of a 48-team World Cup. pic.twitter.com/jzIi6VDP29
— Titus O'Reily (@TitusOReily) January 10, 2017